Three weeks after the date on the letter, I got this schedule notice from FERC,
saying they plan to issue the final Environmental Impact Statement 18 December 2015, and they plan to rubberstamp the permit 17 March 2016,
for Sabal Trail, Transco, and Florida Southeast Connection.
So the opposition has made FERC slip the schedule a month.
This letter does mention a move for the Albany Compressor Station, but it looks to me like it’s referring to the previous site relocation.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
NOTICE OF REVISED SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF THE
SOUTHEAST MARKET PIPELINES PROJECT
(November 19, 2015) Continue reading SMP Schedule
Sabal Trail has backed off its end-of-October FERC filing target,
now saying “sometime later this year”.
Opposition is having some effects!
Robert Hudson wrote for alexcityOutlook.com 1 October 2014,
in Tallapoosa County, Alabama,
where Sabal Trail proposes to start its hundred-foot gouge through three states,
Company preparing to submit natural gas pipeline application to FERC, Continue reading Sabal Trail delays formal FERC filing until “sometime later this year”
FPL wants federal eminent domain to gouge a hundred-foot right of way
for a yard-wide fracked methane pipeline
through Alabama, Georgia, and Florida,
claiming Florida needs new power.
That don’t pass the smell test.
Nationwide electricity demand continues to decline,
as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reminded
the pipeline-permitting Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in April.
EPA asked FPL why it couldn’t implement
conservation, efficiency, compressed gas storage, or other energy sources.
FPL projected 13% electricity demand increase in its
2014 ten-year plan to the Florida Public Service Commission (FL PSC).
A third pipeline would be a 50% increase. Why?
Sabal Trail, the pipeline joint venture of FPL and Spectra Energy of Houston,
claims Duke Energy needs Continue reading It don’t pass the smell test: FPL’s extra natural gas pipeline –SpectraBusters
The Florida Public Service Commission
has a special say in the
Southeast Market Pipelines Project
Florida Southeast Connection (FSC) leg of this pipeline is
completely inside Florida and completely owned by FPL, a Florida regulated
And Florida has a say because the
for the three-part
Transco -> Sabal Trail -> FSC project is that
supposedly Florida needs the power (it doesn’t,
but that’s the excuse).
FPL is getting so desperate for public acceptance of this boondoggle
they pressed their own CEO, Eric Silagy, into attempting to rebut
Our Santa Fe River’s latest entry in the op-ed debate.
Sabal Trail and FERC would like everyone to believe state regulators
have no say, but that’s just not true.
It’s not even clear GA PSC has no say, considering that Continue reading State and local permitting for Sabal Trail pipeline
Spectra, FPL, and Williams have not even formally filed with
FERC for pipeline permits yet, and that process usually takes about a year.
Permitting confusion benefits Spectra about its
Sabal Trail Transmission 36-inch hundred-foot-right-of-way
fracked methane pipeline, because people don’t know what they can do.
You can file ecomments right now, and show up and protest.
As soon as the pipeline company
files for the formal permit process, you can file as an
which gives you legal rights to be heard, file legal briefs,
and to appeal.
state and local permits also have to be filed,
and people can participate in those processes.
Even if there ever is a FERC permit, a landowner who makes
the pipeline company actually go through the eminent domain
process will very likely get a better deal.
If enough landowners say
Come and Take It,
the whole thing may become uneconomical for Spectra,
as for Williams Company when it
cancelled the Bluegrass Pipeline in Kentucky.
Spectra and Williams and FPL are currently in the
pre-filing process with FERC, Continue reading Timeline: Sabal Trail fracked methane pipeline has no permit yet
the denied application that John Peconom gave me:
KeySpan LNG, L.P. and Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC
ORDER DENYING AUTHORIZATION UNDER SECTION 3
KeySpan LNG, L.P.
Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC
AND DISMISSING CERTIFICATE APPLICATION
(Issued July 5, 2005)
In this proceeding, KeySpan LNG, L.P. (KeySpan) requests
section3 of the Natural Gas Act to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas
(LNG) terminal at its existing LNG storage facility in the City of
Island.1 In a related application, Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC (Algonquin) requests
authority under section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act to construct and
operate 1.44 miles of 24-inch diameter pipeline in order to
transport natural gas from KeySpan’s proposed
terminal to Algonquin’s existing interstate pipeline system.2
In essence, KeySpan is proposing Continue reading Keyspan LNG and Algonquin Pipeline denied by FERC
the denied application Kevin Bowman gave me,
and that John Peconom also gave me:
Turtle Bayou Gas Storage Company, LLC Docket No. CP10-481-000
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE AUTHORIZATIONS
(Issued June 16, 2011)
1. On August 9, 2010, Turtle Bayou Gas Storage Company, LLC (Turtle
Bayou) filed an application in Docket No. CP10-481-000 under section 7(c)
of the Natural Gas Act (NGA),1 requesting a
certificate of public convenience and necessity under Part 157, Subpart A,
of the Commission’s regulations2 authorizing
the construction and operation of a salt dome natural gas storage
facility and associated pipeline facilities in Chambers and Liberty
Counties, Texas. In addition, Turtle Bayou seeks a blanket certificate
under Part 157, Subpart F, of the Commission’s regulations to engage
in certain eligible construction activities3
and a blanket certificate under Part 284, Subpart G, of the regulations
to provide open-access transportation services, including storage
service.4 Turtle Bayou also requests
authority to charge market-based rates for its storage services, and
accordingly seeks a waiver of certain filing, accounting, and reporting
requirements. As discussed below, the Commission denies Turtle Bayou’s
application for the requested certificate authorizations.
15 U.S.C. § 717f(c) (2006).
18 C.F.R. Part 157 (2011).
18 C.F.R. Part 284 (2011).
There’s also this: Continue reading Turtle Bayou Gas Storage Company Denied by FERC
Given months to find them, all FERC could come up with
for orders denying certificates was for two liquid natural
gas (LNG) facilities.
Each did have an associated pipeline request,
but neither was for a stand-alone pipeline application.
I do thank John Peconom and Kevin Bowman for providing these
However, really, is this all there is?
I asked John Peconom of FERC for a list of denied pipeline
applications at the
Moultrie makeup Sabal Trail Open House 27 January 2014,
and again after the
Valdosta FERC Scoping Meeting 4 March 2014,
and each time Peconom said he would get me a list,
including the actual orders denying some pipelines.
Moultrie FERC Scoping Meeting 5 March 2014,
I pointed out to the hundred-or-so attendees that
I still hadn’t gotten a list.
After the Moultrie meeting, Kevin Bowman of FERC
gave me a slip of paper with this written on it:
Turtle Bayou Gas
Then John Peconom of FERC sent me an email message with these two links
in it: Continue reading Orders Denying Certificates